In this article published in PCDD Global he invites us to pause and take a closer look, discovering that, despite his brilliance, AI has deep intrinsic shortcomings.
He tells us that this AI, so advanced, does not really “know” in the human sense; it lacks the deep understanding, common sense, or conscience that defines us. It simply operates with the cold logic of algorithms. Nor does he “remember” as we do; it does not treasure subjective experiences or learn from them with the richness of human memory, but stores and retrieves information. And, crucially, he does not “do” things with his own ethical intentionality or assuming intrinsic responsibility for his actions or the consequences of these.
This set of conscious “not-knowing” and “not doings” creates a significant “vacuum.” A space where undetected biases can flourish, where misinformation can spread unchecked, where decisions can be made without empathy, and where accountability becomes diffuse. It’s a gap that technology alone can’t fill.
But the story does not end with the confirmation of this void. The article introduces us to the hero of this narrative: HUMAN GOVERNANCE. It is the only one capable of building bridges over that abyss. Through strong ethical frameworks, thoughtful regulations, and active and vigilant human oversight, we can guide the development and application of AI. It is not about slowing down progress, but about directing it wisely, ensuring that this powerful tool becomes an ally for the common good, mitigating its inherent risks, and filling that void with responsibility, ethics, and human purpose.
At its core, AI is a formidable instrument, but it is we, through effective governance, who must write the script for how it will be used to build a better and fairer future for all.
